Nowadays, investing in young people should not just be a slogan, but the best strategy companies should adopt to grow, innovate and gain competitive advantages over their competitors. Regarding Consea Head Hunting‘s experience in managing recruitment processes with the younger generation, a certain rigidity shown by candidates is emerging, expressed especially in terms of demands related to hybrid working opportunities, career plans and business ethics. As a result, there is often a significant lack of motivation and engagement when faced with an offer that fails to detail or satisfy these aspects.
WHAT CAN ORGANIZATIONS DO?
To make themselves more attractive to the younger generation, companies should first of all understand what is actually being sought, and in this regard, there is an increasing emergence of the importance for young people being able to identify with company values in terms of sustainability (environmental, valuing diversity, inclusive approach and equity), ethics, training (with an important focus on soft skills, skills that can become an asset to the individual and not just a direct benefit to the company as is the case with technical skills), policies for investing in resourcesand sharing the expected goals and their consequent development plans envisaged not only in terms of vertical growth, but also about involvement in initiatives, task forces and projects aimed at the well-being of the internal community. Equally important seems to be the attention paid to the work-life balance, flexibility and wellbeing policies within the organization.
In terms of attraction and retention, an important role is played by the organization’s external communication as the new generations put great importance to the company’s website and its presence on social networks as well as, in general, its web reputation.
COMPANY AS COMMUNITY
This focus is symptomatic of the fact that nowadays the company is no longer considered a mere workplace, on the contrary, it increasingly constitutes a real community for new generations, who can appreciate opportunities of involvement that can allow them to come closer and share experiences with other employees belonging not only to different areas or functions, but also to different generations; of this a significant example could be reverse mentoring.
BETRAYAL OR OPENNESS TO CHANGE?
In conclusion, we can highlight one more peculiarity: increasingly, new generations are experiencing change as a development opportunity to enrich their skills and, therefore, the decision to leave one company for another should not be experienced as a betrayal; on the contrary, it would be much more functional for the organization to maintain relations with the resource who has changed reality by opting for a new context. This attitude could generate future opportunities for a new encounter and possible opportunities to reintegrate the resource, enriched by the new experiences gained in the meantime.
Generations in Dialogue: Gen Z’s Breakthrough and the Rise of a New Balance
Generation Z – those born between the mid-1990s and 2010 – is emerging as a disruptive force in the workplace. They don’t just ask for change: they demand it and actively put it into practice. On one hand, they detach from traditional models; on the other, they create new ways of thinking about careers, leadership, and corporate culture. A shift that, if embraced, can become a competitive advantage for organizations.
Breaking with the Past
Previous generations – Baby Boomers, Gen X, and to some extent Millennials – experienced work as duty, sacrifice, and constant dedication. Being present in the office and overworking were synonymous with commitment and professional worth. Generation Z, however, is challenging these pillars. According to the Deloitte Global Gen Z & Millennial Survey 2025, young workers prioritize work-life balance, mental health, and purpose, while only 6% see leadership as a primary goal. These findings are echoed by Shinde & Surve’s systematic review (2025), which summarized 59 studies on the topic: Gen Z favors work-life balance, salary transparency, fast career progression, and informal communication over rigid, hierarchical models.
Fluid Careers: From the “Ladder” to the “Lily Pad”
A recent Glassdoor (2025) study introduced the concept of the career lily pad: young professionals are moving away from the idea of a linear career (“career ladder”) to build careers with horizontal, diversified “jumps.” Each experience becomes a springboard – an opportunity for learning and personal growth. This is not a lack of ambition: Deloitte data shows that Gen Z is indeed interested in roles of responsibility, but they conceive leadership as inclusive and horizontal, not as a vertical power.
Flexibility, But Not Isolation
Contrary to stereotypes, Generation Z does not want to work exclusively from remote. Research points to a pragmatic approach: only 23% prefer fully remote work (Gallup, 2024);
40% report feeling isolated when working solely from home (The Times, 2025);
86% would give up remote working in exchange for a higher salary (SEEK Survey, 2025). Academic literature confirms this trend. A study published in Business Horizons (Osorio, 2025) shows that young professionals seek hybrid models that combine autonomy, quality infrastructure, and social spaces.
Wellbeing and Workplace Quality
For Gen Z, wellbeing is non-negotiable. Many young employees see features like relaxing areas, pet-friendly offices, and recreational spaces as essential. These are not frivolous perks: a study by Gupta, Chauhan & Singh (2025) demonstrated that flexibility, purpose-driven roles, and digital engagement tools have a significant impact on satisfaction and retention.
Intergenerational Integration as a Strategic Lever
Debates on the future of work often pit generations against each other: on one side Gen Z, perceived as restless and unwilling to sacrifice; on the other Baby Boomers and Gen X, associated with duty and total dedication. But this framing risks becoming a trap. Research shows the real challenge is not to amplify differences, but to build intergenerational integration models. The coexistence of four generations in today’s workplace is a unique opportunity for cross-fertilization. Practices such as reverse mentoring – where younger employees share digital expertise while senior colleagues transfer experience and strategic vision – are showing tangible benefits. Cross-generational teams also foster inclusion, innovation, and belonging. Generation Z should not be seen as “against” older generations, but as a catalyst accelerating an evolution that involves everyone. Within this mosaic, Millennials play a crucial role. They grew up with traditional values similar to Gen X – dedication, career-based recognition – but also pioneered themes such as work-life balance, flexibility, and purpose: the connection between professional activity and a greater goal, beyond profit, touching on social impact, environmental sustainability, equity, and inclusion. Deloitte’s research (2023, 2025) shows how Millennials paved the way for many requests that Gen Z has made more explicit and radical. Now, as many Millennials sit on managerial roles, they can act as a cultural bridge, mediating between Gen Z’s radical vision and the experience of older generations.
A Break That Opens New Paths
Gen Z is breaking away from the myth of the linear career, the culture of overworking, and the idea that sacrifice is the measure of professional worth. And they do so in order to build: more balanced work models,
inclusive and stimulating environments,
empathic and collaborative leadership,
dynamic and personalized careers. Far from being a threat, Gen Z represents a lever for renewal. If organizations can embrace their expectations and integrate them with the old generations’ experience, having Millennials as the bridge, the future of work can become not only more sustainable, but also more innovative and humane. Accompanying companies through this transformation is not only a matter of HR processes, but of organizational culture. Consea has been working for years with companies across industries to foster dialogue among generations, develop inclusive leadership, and build intergenerational collaboration models. Through training programs, mentoring, and people development projects, we help organizations integrate the best of each generation: the experience of senior professionals, the vision of Millennials, and the innovative drive of Gen Z. Because the future of work is not built on rivalry, but on the integration of differences. Reach us out for a consult at conseahcc@consea-group.com ___________ Author: Sara Ruffinatti, Senior Consultant
The current digital context that our global society is facing has a significant impact on the development of new business and management models for organizations. The changes are taking place so quickly that the survival of many companies and businesses is at stake if they do not join the digital age. The change is taking place both in social and personal relationships as well as in our consumers, in our public of interest and in the collaborators of the organizations. Digital transformation is the combination of business strategy and operations with technological innovation, as well as the design of new services (or the redesign of existing ones) to rapidly increase productivity and growth in the value chain: business models , products, customer experience and operations. . . Similarly, the attraction and retention of talent is a great challenge in this process for organizations. People are increasingly digital, therefore, digital skills are becoming the core of the needs of all organizations and sectors. It is essential to understand and know how to analyze the situation in which we currently live. The skill lies in being close to our target audience to give them exactly what they need. Personalization, simplicity and immediacy are some of the keys to face this new stage. Products and services have undergone a true revolution, and value-added services that take advantage of new technologies to generate a direct impact on the customer experience will continue to appear. The optimization of channels and processes as well as the change of the internal culture of companies is a priority in this dizzying digital age. There are many opportunities and threats that this new scenario poses for companies, for this reason, most organizations are turning to new skills and leadership to successfully drive this transition. It is due to this accelerated transition that at Consea Group we carefully study and analyze our opportunities for the implementation of new technologies, which have allowed us to facilitate and streamline the development of our processes, migrating a large percentage of face-to-face work to remote, innovating and positively adapting to this new organizational culture, which as a result has streamlined and strengthened contact and experience with colleagues, clients and candidates (local and global). Authors: Enríque Pedroza - Business Development Manager, Consultor Senior & Headhunter
Post-Vacation Stress or #Stresstember – How To Survive Returning To Work After Vacation
Returning to the office in September post-vacation may be a huge shock for many people. Relaxed after a summer rest, they cannot find themselves in their daily routine and are unable to work at full capacity; they have to catch up, meet new responsibilities and prepare for possible changes. Moreover, the weather changes and colder days keep coming! All of this causes enormous stress – employees are depressed, distracted, and deprived of energy and motivation. This year, an additional stress factor is also the ubiquitous coronavirus pandemicand related restrictions, which significantly affect the work environment and everyday life.
In order to overcome September stress, it is worth introducing a few small changes to your everyday life that will positively affect the quality of your work and well-being.
Here are a few of them: 1. Plan your time skillfully and set a priority list
Organize yourself in different areas of life – get an organizer, calendar or application for saving tasks and events and try to update them on regular basis. Prioritize your tasks and consider postponing or even cancelling events. Scheduling duties will help you avoid unnecessary stress and improve your quality of life. 2. Focus on one task
During your work, try to concentrate fully on one task and finish it before starting the next one. Many people consider multitasking to be a very desirable trait by which success can be achieved much easier and faster, however, this belief is wrong – many studies show that multitasking has more disadvantages than advantages. Multitaskers, while performing multiple tasks simultaneously, waste time on trivial things and the efficiency of their work decreases. Thus, they do not save their precious time – they distract faster and make mistakes more often. 3. Be assertive and do not take too much on yourself
Set your limits and do not be afraid to say no. Do not take on too many tasks and activities – try to maintain a balance between work and private life. You can also ask your colleagues for help at any time. You need to give yourself time to get back to your daily routine! 4. Think about the positive aspects of your job
Focus on the positive sides of your work – what values this job brings, what you learn, and which opportunities you have for personal self–development. You work in a great, well–coordinated team and you like what you do? Appreciate it and try to be positive! 5. Take care of your health
Taking care of your health will positively affect your productivity. Eat nutritionally rich meals, do not skip breakfast and avoid junk food! The better we eat, the more efficient and energetic we are. Be sure to get adequate rest, as well – try to sleep at least 7 hours and mantain the same daily bedtime. Also, remember to exercise – choose a sport you like and include it in your schedule. Physical activity releases endorphins that help fight stress and eliminate anxiety. 6. Take time to relax
You cannot forget about time for yourself! If your schedule is very tight, even a few minutes of meditation, a short walk, or a morning coffee within peace and quiet is enough to regenerate your body and mind and get away from your everyday life.
Consea APAC: China Labor market outlook, with an eye on Asia 2024
More than a year after China’s reopening and its return to normal life, the exodus of foreign talent seems to have been partially stopped, even if many expats had already left the country between 2020 and 2022. In 2020, there were approximately 845,000 foreigners in Mainland China[1], including Chinese citizens holding foreign passports, while in 2023 the recorded number was 711,000.[2] At first glance, this number seems very encouraging, however, what might have changed is its composition. Based on reports from the different European chambers of commerce in China, the number of citizens coming from these countries has drastically reduced. As a matter of fact, according to the report issued by the European Union Chamber of Commerce, 25% of German citizens have left the country permanently, and similar numbers have also been recorded for French and Italian citizens (-20% each).[3] This drop appears to be much more drastic than the -15% recorded in 2023. If we take a closer look, this trend had already started prior the pandemic. Between 2010 and 2020, the number of American (-23%), French (-39%) and German (-22%) citizens on Chinese territory declined sharply, and so did the number of citizens from other countries such as Japan (-44%), South Korea (-51%), Singapore (-32%) and Australia (-4%). On the other hand, inflows from countries such as Myanmar (+783%), Vietnam (+119%), Laos (+590%), Cambodia (+1159%) and North Korea (+88 %) have increased exponentially, as well as for other African and South American countries.[4] The risk, therefore, for the country is to have lost a significant number of high-skilled labor from more developed countries, and to have partially compensated for this loss with the entry of low-skilled labors from emerging countries. This theory also seems to be supported by the distribution of foreign citizens on the territory; cities such as Beijing and Shanghai recorded a sharp decline in the number of immigrants in the period between 2010-2020 (-41.5% and -21.4% respectively), while Yunnan province recorded a 700% increase.[5] In conclusion, although precise data regarding the three-year period of 2020-2022 is still lacking, it is easy to assume that the trend that was already in place in the previous decade has been accelerated by the pandemic and the related restrictions put in place. Moreover, the disruption brought by the pandemic also had, among other effects, a strategic change towards the Chinese market; indeed, many foreign players have decided to adopt a “China for China” approach. China, therefore, is no longer a potential hub for managing the Asia/APAC region, but rather a market with highly localized organizational structures and a scope of responsibility limited only to China Mainland or Greater China borders. This has clearly triggered a greater focus on recruiting local talent, minimizing the number of expats in the country. We, as Consea, have seen first-hand a reduction in the number of executive searches (hyperlink https://consea-group.com/head-hunting/ ) of expatriates in the area. This new structure has led many companies to move their regional HQ, or to relocate some of the foreign decision makers to Singapore or other areas in South East Asia or Far East, depending on the industry and the business model implemented. Furthermore, many companies are evaluating other destinations in Asia for their new FDI (Foreign Direct Investment), such as Singapore (hyperlink https://consea-group.com/2023/06/14/nuova-aperto-a-singapore/ ), but also Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia and India, particularly for the manufacturing sectors. This consideration is the result of several factors, including: the high labor cost: disposable income per capita in 2023 amounted to 39,218 yuan, up 3% on an annual basis in nominal terms[6];
the aging of the workforce: the age of the Chinese workforce increased from 37.1 in 2017 to 38.3 in 2022[7];
other macro-economic factors such as declining population, risk of deflation or stagnation, domestic consumption and exports still low, downturn of real estate market;
and the willingness to diversify the supply chain. FDI in the ASEAN region grew between 2020 and 2022 up to $227Bn, although 2023 saw a decline of -16%, but despite this, the number of greenfield project announcements in the region still increased by 37%. Also, India had a similar path in terms of incoming FDI and "greenfield projects".[8] For this reason, we are seeing a growing demand for foreign talent coming from these areas. Nevertheless, numbers for China seem to be encouraging and improving for 2024. According to official data, unemployment in urban areas fell by 0.4 percentage points in 2023 to 5.2%[9], so did youth unemployment which fell to 14.9% in December 2023, after the peak of 21.3% reached in July of the same year[10]. GDP ‘s growth has returned to levels around +5%[11], and the government is planning various measures and incentives aimed at helping the economy. Among these, of particular importance for companies and foreign citizens, there are certainly the tax exemption on benefits for foreign staff, promulgated until 31 December 2027, and the "visa-free" entry guaranteed to citizens from the main Europeans countries, as well as from Malaysia and Singapore. Although not sufficient to reverse a trend that has been undergoing for several years now, they are certainly important signs of going in the right direction. Author: Matteo Scipioni Bertoli, Head of Business Development & Delivery APAC [1] China embraces increasing foreign residents, China Daily, 2021 https://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202105/12/WS609b14c5a31024ad0babd49f.html [2] Foreigners living in China in 2023 return to 85% of 2019 levels; simplified border measures to facilitate more foreign visitors: NIA, Global Times, 2024 https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202401/1305619.shtml [3] European Chamber of Commerce, European Business in China Shanghai Position Paper 2023/2024. [4] Number of foreigners in China, results of 7th national census, Expat Focus, 2022 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/nfm1Vzfdu0LC8mXgBggxbQ [5] Goodbye China: What Do Fewer Foreigners Mean for Multinationals and the Chinese Economy?, Intereconomics, volume 57, 2022, number 5 https://www.intereconomics.eu/contents/year/2022/number/5/article/goodbye-china-what-do-fewer-foreigners-mean-for-multinationals-and-the-chinese-economy.html#footnote-008 [6] China's per capita disposable income grows 6.3 pct in 2023, Xinhua, The State Council The People’s Republic of China January 17, 2024 https://english.www.gov.cn/archive/statistics/202401/17/content_WS65a73d26c6d0868f4e8e32e0.html [7] China’s Changing Labor Market – Trends and Future Outlook, China Briefing, 2023 https://www.china-briefing.com/news/chinas-labor-force-data-trends-and-future-outlook/ [8] Global FDI in 2023 was weak, with lower flows to developing countries, United Nations UNCTAD, Issue 46, 2024 https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/diaeiainf2024d1_en.pdf [9] China Unemployment Rate, Trading Economics https://tradingeconomics.com/china/unemployment-rate [10]China Youth Unemployment Rate, Trading Economics https://tradingeconomics.com/china/youth-unemployment-rate [11] National Economy Witnessed Momentum of Recovery with Solid Progress in High-quality Development in 2023 https://www.stats.gov.cn/english/PressRelease/202401/t20240117_1946605.html
Navigating the Impact of US Tariffs: Industry-Specific Challenges and Strategic Responses
Updates as of April 29th: President Donald Trump has signed an executive order and a proclamation to ease auto tariffs. While the 25% tariff on imported cars remains unchanged, a new 25% tariff on auto parts will be implemented starting this weekend 3. The new fine print includes provisions for reimbursements to domestic car producers importing car parts. These reimbursements will be capped at 3.75% of the value of domestically produced cars for the first year, decreasing to 2.5% in the second year 3. Additionally, cars containing 85% parts that comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) and produced domestically will effectively avoid tariffs. In the meantime, on the global scale: China Eases Tariffs on Select US Goods: China has recently waived tariffs on US ethane imports, allowing Beijing to maintain a firm public stance while offering some relief.
US-China Tariff Negotiations: President Trump has stated that the US will not drop tariffs on China without something substantial in return. He emphasized the need for China to be more open to US businesses and products.
Tariff Talks with India: US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent mentioned that India is likely to finalize a bilateral trade agreement with the US to avert reciprocal tariffs.
Economic Impact: The ongoing tariff policies have led to a turbulent economy, with China's manufacturing activity falling to a near two-year low. Recent Developments: Global Reactions and Market Impacts Since the announcement, several key developments have emerged: ● China's Retaliation: China has increased reciprocal tariffs on US goods to 84%, significantly impacting US exports to China.
● European Union's Response: The EU imposed 25% tariffs on a range of US imports as a countermeasure.
● Tariff Adjustments: President Trump authorized a 90-day pause on reciprocal tariffs for most countries, except China, where the tariff rate increased to 125%.
● Stock Market Surge: The US stock market surged, gaining $4 trillion in value after the announcement of a 90-day pause on tariffs for over 75 countries. Introduction In April 2025, President Trump announced a series of new tariffs aimed at addressing trade imbalances and protecting American industries. These tariffs, which vary by industry, have significant implications across sectors. This article not only explores the specific impacts on the automotive, machinery, food and beverage, medical devices, and pharmaceutical industries but also highlights the strategic role that Consea's executive search and human capital consulting services can play in helping companies navigate these turbulent times. Automotive Industry: A 25% Tariff Shock The automotive sector now faces a 25% tariff on imports, prompting immediate disruptions—Stellantis, for instance, has already announced temporary layoffs in the US and production suspensions in Mexico and Canada. These underline challenges the need for resilient leadership. Machinery Industry: Rising Costs and Supply Chain Disruptions Tariffs on steel and aluminum have driven up costs for the machinery sector, impacting production schedules for giants like Caterpillar and John Deere. Supply chain delays are becoming a norm, threatening profitability and operational efficiency. Food and Beverage Industry: Tariffs on Italian Imports With a 20% tariff now imposed on imports, the food and beverage industry faces steep cost pressures—illustrated by coffee brands like Lavazza planning to shift to 100% US production. Such policy changes force brands to re-evaluate their sourcing and supply chain strategies. Is Made in Italy in Danger? Our expertise helps companies balance tradition with innovation, ensuring that cherished brands continue to thrive even in a challenging regulatory landscape. Medical Devices: Global Supply Chain Challenges Medical device manufacturers are grappling with tariff-induced cost increases on globally sourced components. These challenges can delay production and reduce the availability of critical medical technologies. Pharmaceutical Industry: An Exemption Amidst Uncertainty While the pharmaceutical industry currently enjoys a tariff exemption, the potential for future policy changes requires vigilance. For These Issues, and Others, Consea is Qualified to Help Consea leverages decades of global expertise and a tailored, relationship-driven approach to help companies navigate the disruptive effects of new tariffs. By identifying and recruiting agile leaders equipped to manage supply chain challenges and operational shifts, we enable businesses to adjust quickly to economic pressures. Our integrated executive search and human capital consulting solutions offer strategic guidance that not only fills critical leadership gaps but also supports long-term growth and resilience in a volatile market. A Confident Partner in the Face of Uncertainty The new US tariffs present significant challenges across multiple industries, but with strategic planning and the right executive talent, companies can navigate these obstacles and continue to thrive. Consea's expertise in both executive search and human capital consulting is critical in supporting businesses through these transitions by providing leaders who drive innovative, agile responses. Take the next step : Contact Consea today for a complimentary, industry-specific tariff impact consultation to learn how we can tailor our executive search and consulting solutions to safeguard your business and drive success in this volatile market. Schedule Your Free Tariff Impact Consultation
Beyond Gen Z: Designing Intergenerational Organizations
In recent years, the discussion about the future of work has been increasingly focused on generations. Millennials, Gen Z, Baby Boomers: each group has been assigned its own expectations, vulnerabilities, and demands. But perhaps we’re looking at the topic from a wrong perspective. Gen Z is not a problem to manage. It is a strategic cue. An indicator that many organizational models, as we’ve known them, are no longer sustainable.
When the issue isn’t age, but the system
Gen Z brings clear expectations into the workplace: balance, purpose, flexibility, well-being, and coherence. These requests are often interpreted as “entitlement” or a lack of willingness to make sacrifices. In reality, Gen Z is simply shedding lights on contradictions that already existed within organizations: stated values that are not reflected in everyday practices
leaders who talk about autonomy and ownership but struggle to truly grant it
performance systems still focused on being present rather on how someone contributed It’s not Gen Z that breaks the system. It is the system that is revealing its cracks.
Moving beyond a generational lens
Continuing to interpret change solely through a generational lens risks becoming a shortcut. It shifts attention away from organizational choices and onto individual characteristics, reinforcing stereotypes: “unstable” young people, “resistant” seniors, “squeezed” middle managers. Designing intergenerational organizations requires a shift in perspective:
not asking how to adapt people to the system, but how to redesign the system to include differences in age, experience, and life stage. In these type of organizations: flexibility is not a perk, but a core operating principle
careers are not linear or one-size-fits-all
value is measured in impact, not hours
Rethinking the psychological contract
One of the key challenges lies in the psychological contract between individuals and organizations. For years, it was based on an implicit agreement: loyalty and availability in return for stability and growth. Today, this contract is under strain. Gen Z makes it explicit yet the discomfort cuts across all ages: senior professionals who no longer recognize themselves in hyper-performance models
middle managers under constant pressure
Millennials are expected to act as a bridge between different perspectives. Intergenerational organizations need a psychological contract that is clearer, more explicit and plural; one that can accommodate diverse needs and expectations.
Leadership for complexity, not for age groups
In this context, leadership must evolve deeply. This is not about “understanding Gen Z” or adopting a more accommodating style. What’s needed is leadership capable of: holding the tension between autonomy and accountability
balancing flexibility with results
creating spaces for dialogue without avoiding decision-making Intergenerational organizations need leaders who can design frameworks, not just control behaviors; leaders who can create meaning, not just alignment.
Beyond Generation Z: a strategic choice
Moving away from the centric focus of Gen Z does not mean ignoring its demands rather it means placing them within a broader vision. Companies that work well for Gen Z are often the ones that work better for everyone: they are clearer, more coherent, and more sustainable. The real challenge is not retaining a generation, but building organizations capable of evolving over time, able to integrate different experiences, skills, and perspectives. Beyond Gen Z lies a strategic choice: either continue adapting people to outdated systems, or redesigning systems to embrace human complexity. The future of work depends on this choice. At Consea, we support organizations in designing leadership and collaborative models that value the contribution of all generations. Because the future of worAnteprima (si apre in una nuova scheda)k is not built by setting differences against each other, but by integrating them consciously and strategically.
Why hiring feels harder than it should be in Industrial and CPG — and it’s not just the labor market
If you work in Industrial, Manufacturing, or CPG, you’ve probably felt it from both sides. Companies say: “We can’t find the right talent.” Professionals say: “Roles aren’t clear, the process takes forever, and expectations keep changing.” Both statements are true — but neither gets to the real issue. From our experience supporting hiring initiatives across these sectors, most hiring challenges aren’t driven by a lack of available talent or motivation. They’re driven by misalignment between how work happens — and how roles are defined, filled, and supported.
The Reality of Industrial and CPG Work Today
These industries operate under constant pressure: Operational continuity
Tight margins
Safety, quality, and compliance standards
Supply chain volatility
Continuous improvement mandates Roles evolve quickly. Priorities shift. Teams are asked to do more with less. Yet hiring often assumes static job descriptions, perfect candidate profiles, and linear decision-making — none of which reflect reality on the ground. That disconnect shows up everywhere: In long hiring cycles
In roles that change 60 days after someone starts
In candidates dropping out of the process
In new hires feeling misled or underprepared
When Job Titles Don’t Match the Job
One of the most common issues we see across Industrial and CPG environments is roles being defined by history, not by current business need. A title stays the same, but: Scope has expanded
Stakeholders have multiplied
Expectations have shifted
Decision authority has changed The result? Candidates don’t know what they’re really signing up for
Hiring managers struggle to articulate what “good” looks like
Teams absorb friction that could have been avoided earlier This isn’t anyone’s fault.
It’s what happens when organizations move faster than their hiring infrastructure.
Hiring Is a Business System, Not a Standalone Process
Hiring outcomes reflect how clearly an organization understands itself. Strong results tend to happen when companies: Are honest about trade-offs (speed vs. experience vs. potential)
Align internally before engaging candidates
Communicate what success looks like in the first 6–12 months
Respect candidates’ time and perspective
Treat hiring as part of operational delivery, not an administrative task When that alignment is missing, even the most attractive brands struggle to convert strong candidates — especially experienced professionals who know their value.
What Candidates Are Responding to Now
Across Industrial and CPG talent markets, professionals are less focused on hype — and more focused on clarity. They’re asking: What problem am I being hired to solve?
How will my work be measured?
Who do I need to influence to be successful?
What will realistically change — and what won’t? Companies that can answer those questions clearly stand out immediately. Not because they’re perfect — but because they’re transparent.
A Better Way Forward
Improving hiring outcomes in Industrial and CPG doesn’t require reinventing the wheel. It starts with: Clear role definition grounded in current reality
Alignment between operations, leadership, and hiring teams
Processes that reflect how decisions are actually made
Conversations that respect both business needs and candidate expectations When hiring mirrors how the business truly operates, everyone wins: Teams onboard faster
New hires perform sooner
Trust increases on both sides of the table
A Thought for Leaders and Candidates Alike
Before assuming hiring is broken because “the market is tough,” it’s worth asking: Are we clear about what the work really requires today? Because in Industrial and CPG, clarity isn’t a nice-to-have — it’s a competitive advantage. Author: Candice Gist-Shaw, Delivery Manager Americas
Upskilling and reskilling are particularly important in 2026 as companies now operate in an environment shaped by rapid technological, demographic, and market changes. For HR, they are no longer just an added value but a core element of survival and growth strategy. Reskilling is the process of changing professional qualifications, in which employees acquire entirely new competencies or specializations. As a result, they can take on different responsibilities or perform new roles within the organization. Upskilling, on the other hand, refers to developing and deepening existing skills. Its goal is to increase effectiveness in one’s current role and better adapt to new requirements, tools, or technologies. In this case, development takes place within the same career path and focuses on strengthening current competencies.
The importance of reskilling and upskilling stems from: Automation and the growing popularity of AI The development of AI and automation means that many traditional tasks are being optimized and/or replaced by technology. As a result, employees will need to acquire new skills to work alongside automated systems or take on new roles created as a consequence of these changes. Additionally, organizations will need to invest in upskilling to ensure their workforce keeps pace with the latest technologies and methodologies. The skills gap Our experience in the Polish market highlights a growing reality: the gap between available skills and those required by organizations is widening — and it is likely to remain a defining challenge for the labor market. High employee retention Amid growing competition for valuable employees, companies that offer upskilling and reskilling opportunities are more likely to retain team members who already possess experience and critical competencies. By providing opportunities for growth and internal mobility, organizations increase employee engagement and job satisfaction.
Challenges of upskilling/ reskilling Time and resource investment: Upskilling and reskilling require time, money, and resources, and must fit into employees’ schedules. You must obtain funding for training, integrate learning into daily workflows, or offer flexible learning options. Aligning skills with business goals: It’s essential to identify the right skills for future success and ensure learning initiatives match company priorities. Collaboration among HR, management, and department heads is key. Employee resistance: Some employees may not see the value in upskilling or fear job displacement. You need to communicate the benefits clearly and provide appropriate support throughout the process. Leadership support: As part of the HR team, you should make sure leaders constantly prioritize reskilling and upskilling. Evolving technology and learning fatigue: As tech evolves quickly, you must keep training content up-to-date and avoid overwhelming staff with irrelevant or repetitive material.
Summary
Reskilling and upskilling are no longer optional—they’re strategic moves for creating a future-ready workforce, and it’s your responsibility to guide employees through these critical transitions. When learning aligns with business objectives and employee needs, organizations have better flexibility, employee retention, and can close the talent gap. Upskilling and reskilling programs tailored to the company’s strategic evolution are like building up an always-on innovation pipeline fuelled by incredible talent. When companies lean into empowering employee growth through continuous skills development, they create opportunities that enable them to adapt to a shifting future – while attracting high performers who will ultimately drive the business forward. At Consea Group, we believe that investing in people is not just a response to change, but a proactive strategy to shape it. By aligning talent development with our Clients’ business goals, we help organizations attract and develop the competencies that enhance agility and build teams ready for the challenges of the future. Author: Iga Paszkiewicz – Recruitment Consultant PL
Upskilling and Reskilling: Dlaczego są kluczowe w 2026 roku
Upskilling i reskilling są szczególnie ważne w 2026 roku, ponieważ firmy funkcjonują dziś w środowisku szybkich zmian technologicznych, demograficznych i rynkowych. Dla HR to już nie tylko dodatek, ale również element strategii przetrwania i wzrostu. Reskilling to proces zmiany kwalifikacji zawodowych, w ramach którego pracownicy zdobywają zupełnie nowe kompetencje lub specjalizacje. Dzięki temu mogą realizować inne obowiązki lub pełnić odmienne role w organizacji niż dotychczas. Natomiast upskilling oznacza rozwijanie i pogłębianie już posiadanych umiejętności. Celem jest podniesienie efektywności w obecnej roli oraz lepsze dostosowanie się do nowych wymagań, narzędzi czy technologii. W tym przypadku rozwój odbywa się w obrębie tej samej ścieżki zawodowej i służy wzmacnianiu dotychczasowych kompetencji.
Kluczowość reskillingu i upskillingu wynika z: Automatyzacji i rosnącej popularności AI Postęp w obszarze sztucznej inteligencji i automatyzacji powoduje, że wiele dotychczasowych obowiązków jest usprawnianych lub przejmowanych przez technologie. W efekcie pracownicy będą musieli rozwijać nowe kompetencje, by efektywnie współpracować z systemami automatycznymi albo obejmować stanowiska powstające w wyniku tych zmian. Jednocześnie firmy staną przed koniecznością inwestowania w upskilling, tak aby ich zespoły mogły na bieżąco dostosowywać się do dynamicznie rozwijających się technologii i nowoczesnych metod pracy. Luki kompetencyjnej Nasze doświadczenia na polskim rynku pokazują rosnący trend: luka między dostępnymi umiejętnościami a tymi wymaganymi przez organizacje się powiększa — i prawdopodobnie pozostanie jednym z kluczowych wyzwań dla rynku pracy. Dużej retencji pracowników W warunkach nasilającej się rywalizacji o utalentowanych pracowników przedsiębiorstwa, które zapewniają możliwości upskillingu i reskillingu, mają większe szanse na utrzymanie doświadczonych osób posiadających kluczowe dla firmy kompetencje. Dając im perspektywę rozwoju oraz awansu wewnętrznego, organizacje wzmacniają ich zaangażowanie, lojalność i satysfakcję z wykonywanej pracy.
Wyzwania procesu Upskillingu / Reskillingu Inwestycja czasu i zasobów: Upskilling i reskilling wymagają czasu, pieniędzy oraz zasobów i muszą być dopasowane do harmonogramu pracy pracowników. Należy zabezpieczyć budżet na szkolenia, zintegrować naukę z codziennymi obowiązkami lub zapewnić elastyczne formy uczenia się. Dopasowanie kompetencji do celów biznesowych: Kluczowe jest zidentyfikowanie umiejętności niezbędnych do osiągnięcia przyszłego sukcesu oraz upewnienie się, że inicjatywy rozwojowe są zgodne z priorytetami firmy. Współpraca między HR, kadrą zarządzającą i menedżerami działów ma tu zasadnicze znaczenie. Opór pracowników: Niektórzy pracownicy mogą nie dostrzegać wartości upskillingu lub obawiać się utraty pracy. Konieczne jest jasne komunikowanie korzyści oraz zapewnienie odpowiedniego wsparcia na każdym etapie procesu. Wsparcie ze strony liderów: Jako członek zespołu HR powinieneś zadbać o to, aby liderzy konsekwentnie traktowali reskilling i upskilling jako priorytet. Dynamiczny rozwój technologii i zmęczenie nauką: W obliczu szybkiego rozwoju technologii należy regularnie aktualizować treści szkoleniowe oraz unikać przeciążania pracowników nieistotnymi lub powtarzalnymi materiałami.
Podsumowanie
Reskilling i upskilling przestały być dodatkiem – dziś stanowią element strategii budowania organizacji przygotowanej na przyszłe wyzwania, a Twoim zadaniem jest skutecznie przeprowadzić pracowników przez ten proces zmian. Gdy rozwój kompetencji jest powiązany zarówno z celami biznesowymi, jak i realnymi potrzebami zespołu, firma zyskuje większą elastyczność działania, poprawia poziom retencji oraz skuteczniej zmniejsza lukę kompetencyjną. Programy podnoszenia kwalifikacji i przekwalifikowania, dostosowane do strategicznej ewolucji firmy, są jak budowanie stale działającego „rurociągu” innowacji, napędzanego przez niezwykłe talenty. Organizacje, które świadomie wspierają rozwój pracowników poprzez ciągłe doskonalenie kompetencji, tworzą warunki do adaptacji w zmieniającej się rzeczywistości — a jednocześnie przyciągają najlepszych specjalistów, którzy ostatecznie napędzają rozwój biznesu. W Consea Group wierzymy, że inwestowanie w ludzi to nie tylko odpowiedź na zmiany, ale przede wszystkim proaktywna strategia ich kształtowania. Łącząc rozwój talentów z celami biznesowymi naszych Klientów, pomagamy organizacjom pozyskiwać i rozwijać kompetencje, które zwiększają ich zwinność oraz budują zespoły gotowe na wyzwania przyszłości.
The New Executive Search in Brazil: The Silent War for Leaders Who Don’t Yet Exist
For decades, the Brazilian executive search market operated according to a relatively predictable logic: identifying executives with solid career trajectories, consistent industry experience, a track record of results, and strong political acumen. This model worked in a young Brazil, with a growing population, an abundant labor force, and relatively clear economic cycles. But the country has changed. And senior executive recruitment has not. Brazil is aging faster than companies can grasp. Brazil’s economically active population is undergoing a historic transformation. Between 2006 and 2020, the share of professionals over 50 in the formal labor market jumped from 12.6% to 19%. In absolute numbers, the total has nearly doubled: from 4.4 million to 8.7 million workers. The projections are even more striking: by 2040, six out of ten Brazilian workers will be over 45 years old. This completely changes the logic of the leadership pipeline in Brazil. The problem is that companies continue to hire CEOs and executives as if we were still in 2005. Meanwhile: 78% of Brazilian companies admit to having age barriers in hiring, 41% of Brazilian professionals report experiencing age discrimination in the corporate environment, and more than 65% of companies still lack structured generational inclusion programs. The math is harsh. Brazil is aging. Executives are aging. Consumers are aging. But selection criteria remain stuck in adolescence. Traditional executive search has always sought predictable patterns: specific universities; linear careers; similar international experiences; “safe” profiles; politically neutral leaders; executives molded to preserve structures. The problem is that the Brazilian business environment no longer rewards stability and has begun to reward extreme adaptability. The new high-performance executive is not necessarily the most technically skilled. Companies today need leaders capable of operating simultaneously across five tensions: growth with austerity; transformation with legacy; innovation with governance; speed with scarcity; artificial intelligence with human leadership. This radically alters the role of executive search. The search is no longer just for experience but for mental architecture. The Brazilian paradox: there is a shortage of ready-made leaders precisely when there is an excess of available experience. Brazil currently has more than 23.5 million professionals over the age of 50 active in the labor market. Yet boards continue to repeat a dangerously misguided phrase: “We can’t find ready successors.” They do find them. But they often dismiss these executives because the market has created a silent bias: associating youth with transformation and maturity with obsolescence. This is a strategic mistake. The coming decades will be less about technical knowledge and more about executive judgment. And judgment isn’t accelerated by an MBA. It is forged in crises. The next corporate war will be generational, and few companies are prepared to manage organizations where the following will coexist simultaneously: Baby Boomers;
Generation X;
Millennials;
Generation Z;
and, soon, Generation Alpha. Five generations coexisting within the same corporate structure represent more than just age diversity. They represent different relationships with power, authority, career, risk, loyalty, speed, technology, and purpose. Any company that fails to effectively manage this coexistence will face a structural problem with execution. The executive search of the future will not merely recruit functional leaders. It will recruit generational interpreters. Executive search is no longer just recruitment. It has become competitive intelligence. The best executive search processes no longer begin with a job description. They begin with a much deeper question:
“What kind of leadership will be needed to survive in Brazil over the next 10 years?”
That answer is rarely found within the company. Because the greatest corporate risk today is not technological. It is cognitive. Companies fail because they continue to make decisions using outdated mental maps. The true role of modern executive search is to break through thought bubbles. Not just to fill seats. Brazil will face a severe shortage of adaptive leadership, and in the coming years, the country will simultaneously grapple with: an aging population, a shortage of specialized talent, pressure for productivity, accelerated technological transformation, increased regulatory complexity, ESG pressure, and profound changes in consumer behavior. This will require a new category of executives. Fewer “process managers.” More transformation architects. The problem is that these leaders are rare. And rarity completely changes the game of executive search. In the near future, companies will not just compete for market share. They will compete for executive cognitive capacity. The most dangerous advice in the market today is: “bring in someone like the previous one.” That phrase has destroyed more companies than economic crises. The emerging Brazil demands different CEOs: more adaptable; less hierarchical; more human; more context-oriented; more emotionally resilient; and far better prepared to lead in ambiguity. Modern executive search can no longer be conservative. Because the Brazilian business environment is no longer. The question that will define the winners Brazilian companies still ask old questions: “Who has done this before?” “Who knows the industry?” “Who comes from a competitor?” “Who fits the cultural profile?” Winning companies will start asking something different:
“Who can lead a future we can’t yet describe?”
This will be the true frontier of executive search in Brazil. And it has already begun. Author: Samir Amad, Country Manager Brazil Sources: The main sources used for demographic data, the labor market, and projections were: IBGE, IPEA, Agência Brasil, and studies and analyses on age inclusion and professionals aged 50+.
O Novo Executive Search no Brasil: a Guerra Silenciosa pelos Líderes que Ainda Não Existem
Durante décadas, o mercado brasileiro de executive search operou sob uma lógica relativamente previsível: identificar executivos com trajetória sólida, experiência setorial consistente, histórico de resultados e boa capacidade política. Esse modelo funcionou em um Brasil jovem, em expansão populacional, abundante em mão de obra e com ciclos econômicos relativamente claros. Mas o país mudou. E o recrutamento de altos executivos ainda não. O Brasil está envelhecendo mais rápido do que as empresas conseguem entender. A população economicamente ativa brasileira está sofrendo uma transformação histórica. Entre 2006 e 2020, a participação de profissionais acima de 50 anos no mercado formal saltou de 12,6% para 19%. Em números absolutos, o total praticamente dobrou: de 4,4 milhões para 8,7 milhões de trabalhadores. As projeções são ainda mais impactantes: até 2040, seis em cada dez trabalhadores brasileiros terão mais de 45 anos. Isso muda completamente a lógica do leadership pipeline no Brasil. O problema é que as empresas continuam contratando CEOs e diretores como se ainda estivéssemos em 2005. Enquanto isso: 78% das empresas brasileiras admitem possuir barreiras etárias na contratação, 41% dos profissionais brasileiros relatam sofrer discriminação etária no ambiente corporativo, mais de 65% das empresas ainda não possuem programas estruturados de inclusão geracional. A matemática é cruel. O Brasil está envelhecendo. Os executivos estão envelhecendo. Os consumidores estão envelhecendo. Mas os critérios de seleção continuam adolescentes. O executive search tradicional sempre buscou padrões previsíveis: universidades específicas; carreiras lineares; experiências internacionais semelhantes; perfis “seguros”; líderes politicamente neutros; executivos moldados para preservar estruturas. O problema é que o ambiente de negócios brasileiro deixou de recompensar estabilidade e passou a premiar adaptabilidade extrema. O novo executivo de alta performance não é necessariamente o mais técnico. As empresas hoje precisam de líderes capazes de operar simultaneamente em cinco tensões: crescimento com austeridade; transformação com legado; inovação com governança; velocidade com escassez; inteligência artificial com liderança humana. Isso altera radicalmente o papel do executive search. A busca deixa de ser apenas por experiência e passa a ser por arquitetura mental. O paradoxo brasileiro: faltam líderes prontos justamente quando há excesso de experiência disponível. O Brasil possui hoje mais de 23,5 milhões de profissionais acima de 50 anos ativos no mercado de trabalho. Ainda assim, conselhos seguem repetindo uma frase perigosamente equivocada: “Não encontramos sucessores prontos.” Encontram, sim. Mas frequentemente descartam esses executivos porque o mercado criou um viés silencioso: associar juventude à transformação e maturidade à obsolescência. Isso é um erro estratégico. As próximas décadas serão menos sobre conhecimento técnico e mais sobre julgamento executivo. E julgamento não se acelera em MBA. Ele é construído em crises. A próxima guerra corporativa será geracional e poucas empresas estão preparadas para administrar organizações onde coexistirão simultaneamente: Baby Boomers;
Geração X;
Millennials;
Geração Z;
e, em breve, Geração Alpha. Cinco gerações convivendo na mesma estrutura corporativa não representam apenas diversidade etária. Representam diferentes relações com poder, autoridade, carreira, risco, lealdade, velocidade, tecnologia e propósito. A empresa que não souber liderar essa convivência terá um problema estrutural de execução. O executive search do futuro não recrutará apenas líderes funcionais. Recrutará tradutores geracionais. O executive search deixou de ser recrutamento. Tornou-se inteligência competitiva. Os melhores processos de busca de executivos não começam mais com uma job description. Começam com uma pergunta muito mais profunda:
“Que tipo de liderança será necessária para sobreviver ao Brasil dos próximos 10 anos?”
Essa resposta raramente está dentro da empresa. Porque o maior risco corporativo hoje não é tecnológico. É cognitivo. Empresas fracassam porque continuam tomando decisões usando mapas mentais ultrapassados. O verdadeiro papel do executive search moderno é romper bolhas de pensamento. Não apenas preencher cadeiras. O Brasil viverá uma escassez brutal de liderança adaptativa e nos próximos anos, o país enfrentará simultaneamente: envelhecimento populacional, escassez de talentos especializados, pressão por produtividade, transformação tecnológica acelerada, aumento da complexidade regulatória, pressão ESG, e mudanças profundas no comportamento de consumo. Isso exigirá uma nova categoria de executivos. Menos “gestores de processos”. Mais arquitetos de transformação. O problema é que esses líderes são raros. E raridade muda completamente o jogo do executive search. No futuro próximo, empresas não disputarão apenas market share. Disputarão capacidade cognitiva executiva. O conselho mais perigoso do mercado hoje é: “traga alguém parecido com o anterior” Essa frase destruiu mais empresas do que crises econômicas. O Brasil que emerge exige CEOs diferentes: mais adaptáveis; menos hierárquicos; mais humanos; mais orientados a contexto; mais resilientes emocionalmente; e muito mais preparados para liderar ambiguidade. O executive search moderno não pode mais ser conservador. Porque o ambiente de negócios brasileiro já não é. A pergunta que definirá os vencedores As empresas brasileiras ainda fazem perguntas antigas: “Quem já fez isso antes?” “Quem conhece o setor?” “Quem vem de concorrente?” “Quem tem o perfil cultural?” As empresas vencedoras começarão a perguntar algo diferente:
“Quem consegue liderar um futuro que ainda não sabemos descrever?”
Essa será a verdadeira fronteira do executive search no Brasil. E ela já começou. Autor: Samir Amad, Country Manager Brasil Fontes: As principais fontes utilizadas para dados demográficos, mercado de trabalho e projeções foram: IBGE, IPEA, Agência Brasil e Estudos e análises sobre inclusão etária e profissionais 50+.
Inclusive Leadership: Towards Embracing Diversity and Collective Success
Inclusive leadership represents the core of a work environment that embraces and celebrates diversity as a driving force for collective success. Defined as the ability to manage and guide a group of people while respecting their diversities empathetically and without prejudice, Inclusive Leadership goes beyond mere team management, recognizing the intrinsic value of each individual and their uniqueness, encouraging active participation, and fostering a sense of belonging and community. Here are some points for reflection gathered by Consea Human Capital Consulting, through dialogues with numerous CEOs and human resources managers.
What are the distinctive traits of an inclusive leader?
An inclusive leader must employ skills such as empathy, effective communication, listening, flexibility, openness to change, awareness of diversities, and responsibility. These traits and skills are fundamental in creating a work environment where every person feels valued and respected as an integral part of collective success. An inclusive leader embodies these traits and skills, acting as a guiding beacon for the team and transforming differences into a springboard for innovation and creativity, crucial for the long-term success of an organization.
What impact can this leadership model have on the organization's business areas?
The beneficial effect of inclusive leadership is not limited to the organizational climate alone. It also extends to key business areas such as research and development, marketing, and external communication. The inclusive approach allows for gaining a competitive advantage, enabling companies to better understand the needs of an increasingly diverse and global market. The diversity within the organization reflects positively in the ability to adapt quickly to changing customer needs and to create innovative and meaningful solutions.
Is the presence of inclusive leaders sufficient to truly make an entire company inclusive?
The answer to this question is no: to foster a truly inclusive corporate culture, the presence of inclusive leaders alone is not enough. It is also necessary to invest in training and the development of key skills at all levels of the organization. Promoting open communication and dialogue, awareness of implicit biases, and constructive conflict management are just some of the fundamental elements in building and maintaining an inclusive and stimulating work environment. In conclusion, Inclusive Leadership represents an essential pillar for guiding future business strategies. Through the promotion of diversity and inclusion, ambitious goals such as improving productivity, retaining talents, promoting innovation, and building a strong reputation can be achieved. Investing in the training and development of inclusive skills is a fundamental step towards creating a fair, inclusive, and prosperous work environment for all. Authors
Gabriella Carello – General Manager Consea Human Capital Consulting
Sara Ruffinatti – Senior Consultant Consea Human Capital Consulting
We and third parties have selected cookies or similar technologies for technical purposes and, with your consent, also for other purposes ("experience improvement" and "measurement") as specified in the Privacy policy and Cookie policy. You can freely give, refuse or withdraw your consent at any time.You can consent to the use of these technologies by using the "Accept all" button. By closing this information, you continue without accepting.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
